Accounting for the presence of < o > in < love >
Our still provisional spelling < luve > is subject to a further orthographic convention that concerns the juxtaposition of < u > and < v >.
The < uv > convention
Just as the practice arose of avoiding writing < uu > to avoid “collision” with the letter < w > ‘double U’, it similarly applied to the avoidance of < uv >; we are reminded again of the fact that, until comparatively recently, < u > and < v > were allophones of the same letter.
We can state this Modern English spelling convention like this.
Avoid writing < uv > in a word of basic English origin.
The question then arises as to which letter is substituted for the < u >. We see from the standard spelling of < love > that the substitute letter is < o >.
l
ve ➜ love
Here is the start of an evidence bank of words in which the pronunciation / ᴧv / would initially suggest the spelling < uv > but where it is actually < ov >.
love dove above glove
oven shovel
This convention is a result of the fact that the letters < v > and < u > are, in origin, variations of the same letter.
It is because, until comparatively recently, the letter forms < u > and < v > were variations of the same letter that the avoidance of writing < uu > also applies to avoiding writing < uv >.
We could represent our conclusions like this.
We might represent the development of the spelling of < love > a few centuries ago in a way that illustrates how the earlier spellings are visually less accessible than the much clearer modern standard form.
Other cases of < o > replacing an expected < u >
We could regard < o > is a paired alternative to default < u >. Here are several common words in which < o > is used where, if the bogus ‘alphabetic principle’ of phonics were true, the letter < u > would be expected.
among come mother other ton
won some honey front monkey
In several spellings where < o > is preferred to < u > there is a clear orthographic reason for the choice. The word < month > is related to < moon > and Monday. (< Sunday >, however, is not spelled with < o > as it is related to < sun >.)
- You will find resources for understanding the spelling of the days of the week in Kit 2 Theme L .
The word < none > is the negative of < one >. The Old English negative was < ne >, so < none > can be regarded as a type of contraction of < ne + one >.
- The reason for < o > in the spelling of < one > itself is given in Kit 3 Theme J which deals with the spelling of numbers.
A summary of < u > and < v > orthographic conventions
Apart from the pronouns < thou > and < you >, no complete English word has final < u >.In a phonological spelling (which is, by definition, provisional) the sequence < uv > is rewritten as < ov >.In a phonological spelling the sequence < uu > is rewritten
as < ou >.In a phonological spelling the sequence < wu > is rewritten as < wo >.
The orthographic content of this site is copyright ©1999-2025 by Real Spelling and Pascal Mira. All rights reserved. Permission to publish their content was granted by Real Spelling to M. Berman in 2019. The content required for the website's operation is copyright ©2019-2025 by M. Berman, all rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except for use by the subscriber's children or classes, without the prior written permission of the publisher or in accordance with the Copyright, Design, and Patents Act 1988. The material on this site is for the exclusive use of the subscribers to the site, and their children and students. Copyright holders are not responsible for your misuse of the English language nor any damages ensuing from that misuse.